PROFILE: Rachel Watson – OX2 Australia County Manager
Published Date : 2024-April-23, Tuesday
It’s been
almost 12 months since Sweden-headquartered OX2 made its first acquisition
outside Europe, buying Australian renewables developer ESCO Pacific. As part of
the deal OX2 took control of the assets of one of Australia’s most active solar
farm developers, seeing “great potential in the Australian market for
renewables and opportunities to expand the operations of ESCO Pacific.” After
consolidating its new Australian operations, OX2 has quietly been going about
its business here. AltEnergy caught up with Country Manager Rachel Watson to
check on OX2’s progress so far in Australia, and find out what we can expect in
the future.
1. Q: Rachel,
can you give us a brief overview of what’s been happening at OX2 Australia in
the almost 12 months since OX2 acquired ESCO Pacific?
RW: It’s been a big 12 months! Our areas of focus broadly fall under three headings: people, projects, and processes. We have been building out the team to add capability to scale up the business, bringing on more development and engineering capacity as well as firepower in the transactions team. We have also established a construction team so we can expand our offering to investors to include construction management. The ESCO Pacific project pipeline OX2 acquired has a number of projects ready for the final push to financial close, so we have been working hard on those projects. Elsewhere, we have been looking for ways to add value to the existing projects, for example, by adding battery storage, by changing the size of the project or by developing a construction solution. While all this has been happening, we have also been merging the ESCO Pacific business into OX2’s world, which has meant quite a lot of change for everyone.
2. Q: In
December an agreement was made between Google, AirTrunk and OX2 for a long-term
Power Purchase Agreement to support the development of a new 25 MW solar farm
in the Riverina district of New South Wales (to be developed by OX2) – what is
the latest update with this project?
RW: We are
closing out final development issues in preparation for having construction
commence shortly.
3. Q: Can we
expect to see progress with any other of OX2’s development projects in the
short to mid term, and anything in particular to keep an eye on?
RW: We have
been making good progress across the project pipeline. For example, in the last
10 months, we have received 5.3.4A letters enabling connections to proceed on
three projects (two in Victoria and one in New South Wales). We have also
lodged two major development applications for projects in NSW and closed out a
number of other development items on late-stage projects. We continue to
focus our efforts on getting some projects through to financial close in 2024.
4. Q: OX2’s
recently released annual report mentions “great
potential in increasing the product range to include the sale of turnkey
projects, expanding through project acquisitions and adding onshore wind power
to the business.” Is there anything more specific you can tell us about in
relation to project sales, acquisitions and additions at this stage Rachel?
RW: Selling
projects is our business, and we are always looking for ways to add value to
projects in our pipeline and projects that we might acquire. Our focus in
growing the pipeline is on onshore wind, as that is OX2’s main business in
Europe. We are looking at some very interesting, early stage onshore wind
prospects at the moment.
5. Q: The
annual report also mentions OX2 is evaluating offshore wind power
and hydrogen projects in Australia. Can you share any more details about these?
RW: We are in
the early stages of evaluating these opportunities in Australia. OX2 has
had recent success in securing permits for offshore wind developments in Europe
and in finding partners for offshore projects so we will continue to search for
the right opportunity in Australia.
6. Q: At the
time of the ESCO Pacific acquisition OX2 said it saw “great potential in the
Australian market for renewables”. Do you think we currently have the right
federal and state government policy settings and market settings to help
achieve this potential?
RW: There is
no doubt that Australia is a leading renewable energy market, with projects at
a scale that isn’t achievable in many other countries and great renewable
energy resources. However, we have been on a long journey with many
twists and turns along the way, and there is always room for improvement.
The CIS is a good example. It is tangible evidence of the federal
government’s commitment to achieving our 2030 target, and at the same time it
has contributed uncertainty to the market which might cause some hesitation
among investors while the impact of the CIS becomes clearer. If this
intervention can accelerate projects reaching financial close, and perhaps
provide support for projects that would otherwise not be built, then it will be
very worthwhile. If it simply results in projects that would have been
built anyway having another commercialisation option available, then it might
not be accelerating our progress to our targets. Whatever the result, we
can’t simply set and forget any of these policy initiatives, and governments
and industry will need to be in constant dialogue about what is working and
what might need change.
7. Q: Any
reaction to the federal government’s recently announced “Future Made in
Australia Act”?
RW: Support
for securing our supply chains and developing expertise within Australia is
always welcome and needs to be done thoughtfully. We absolutely need to
focus efforts on industries where we can be competitive and where Australia has
a strategic advantage. We have a good track record of coming up with new
technology and technological advancement, so there should be initiatives worthy
of this support. If the “Future Made in Australia Act” provides an
incentive for those pockets of innovation and competitiveness to be brought
into the light and fostered to scale, then it has great potential to support
the development of renewable energy.
8. Q: Do you
have any opinion either way about the nuclear energy option for Australia?
RW: The prize
is to get as much renewable energy into our system as possible. Renewable
energy is the solution for the here and now, and with most of our coal
generation closing by 2035, we don’t have any time to waste. It makes no
sense to me to divert efforts away to a technology for which we are completely
unprepared, and which will be more than a decade away in coming to
fruition.